NetNut vs IPRoyal
NetNut and IPRoyal are routinely shortlisted together. Here is where each one comes out ahead on published features, pricing and editorial score.
3 of 8 rows are identical
| Compared on | NetNutBest in 2/2Our pick |  IPRoyalBest in 0/2 |
|---|---|---|
| Crunch Score | Crunch Score 89— best in this row | Crunch Score 81 |
| User rating | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| Reviews | 0 | 0 |
| Starting price | $1.60/IP | $1.80/IP |
| Countries | 195 | 195 |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Founded | 2,017 | 2,020 |
| Proxy types | Static ISP | Static ISP, Mobile 4G/5G |
NetNut takes it overall — but the margin is narrower than the score gap suggests, and the loser is the better pick on a tighter budget.
Where NetNut wins
ISP-backed exits with datacenter stability. On paper it leads on the features that matter most for demanding workloads.
Where IPRoyal wins
Pay-as-you-go with no expiring traffic. It closes the gap on price and, depending on your workload shape, can be the better economic choice.
How we compared them
Both listings are scored against the same published criteria, with pricing compared across every published tier. Every weight behind the scores is on our methodology page.