AdsPower

Built for ad-account farms, with RPA baked in

83See the breakdownEditors' choice: anti-detect browsers #3

Visit AdsPowerAffiliate link · never affects the scoreSave

Profiles: 10 free, unlimited paid
From: $9/mo
Platforms: 2
Teams: Yes
Free plan: Yes
Founded: 2019

Editor’s verdict

The best value if you run ad accounts at volume.

Editorial rating 4.2/5 · last reviewed 2026-07-01

Overview

AdsPower targets paid-media teams running many ad accounts, and ships a no-code RPA builder for repetitive account actions.

Pros

Lowest paid entry price
Built-in no-code RPA
10 free profiles
Strong platform-specific templates

Cons

No Linux client
UI is dense

How the score is built

8 editorial criteria

Rated by our editors against published criteria. It is an opinion with its weights shown — not a performance test.

83Full methodology

Crunch Score breakdown: each signal, its score out of 5, its weight, and why
Signal	Score	Weight	Why
Reliability	3.9	21%	Editorial rating of reliability, based on the provider's published success-rate figures, SLA terms and reader reports.
Weight 21% ·Editorial rating of reliability, based on the provider's published success-rate figures, SLA terms and reader reports.
Value for money	4.1	17%	Value for money across every published plan tier.
Weight 17% ·Value for money across every published plan tier.
Speed	4.5	14%	Editorial rating of speed, based on the provider's published performance figures and reader reports.
Weight 14% ·Editorial rating of speed, based on the provider's published performance figures and reader reports.
Trust & transparency	4.2	14%	Sourcing transparency, logging policy, KYC friction and published audits.
Weight 14% ·Sourcing transparency, logging policy, KYC friction and published audits.
Location targeting	4.0	10%	Country, city and ASN targeting options, as listed in the provider's documentation.
Weight 10% ·Country, city and ASN targeting options, as listed in the provider's documentation.
Pool size	4.3	10%	Pool size and subnet/ASN diversity, as published by the provider.
Weight 10% ·Pool size and subnet/ASN diversity, as published by the provider.
Docs & API	3.9	7%	API and documentation quality, rated by our editors against a fixed rubric.
Weight 7% ·API and documentation quality, rated by our editors against a fixed rubric.
Support	4.4	7%	Support channels and hours the provider offers, and how readers describe their support experience.
Weight 7% ·Support channels and hours the provider offers, and how readers describe their support experience.